In “The Summoned Self,” written by David Brooks, he raises
the question what kind of life does or should someone live. Brooks states there
are “two ways of thinking about your life.” The first is the well-planned life,
while the second is the summoned life. This article is intended for the reader
to look deeply into their life and what is more important to them.
If
an individual lives a well-planned life, they are to come up with what they
want to accomplish overall in their lifetime and their purpose in life. While
describing this way of living one’s life, Brooks uses the Harvard Business
Review’s article on Clayton Christensen who describes how he would “spend an
hour every night reading, thinking, and praying about why God put [him] on this
earth.” Once he was able to figure out his purpose, Christensen was able to
allocate all of his resources into accomplishing that purpose. An individual
can allocate their time for short term gains but for long term ones as well.
When devoting quality time to a certain aspect of their life one can tweak the
future outcome. This is the idea behind a well-planned life, an individual
controlling different aspects of their life in order to bring “a well-rounded
fruition.”
In
contrast there is the summoned life which “isn’t a project to be completed; it
is an unknowable landscape to be explored.” This is the way of life for someone
who is more focused on the situation they are in, instead of focusing on the situation
they want to be in. Their decisions are ones based on the moment without
contemplating the ramifications of their decisions. Living the well-planned
life calls for an individual who is a critical thinker or strategist while the
summoned life calls for an individual that is free-spirited and lives on a
whim. They view what needs to be accomplished in the present because that is
what they are living for. Their decisions are made based off of “sensitive
observation and situational awareness, not calculation and long-range
planning.”
Brooks
discusses both types of lifestyles; however, he discusses the well-planned life
more than the summoned life. While ending his article he focusses on the
critical thinking aspect of the well-planned life and praises America for its
focus on this lifestyle because it births “lone free [agents] who [create] new
worlds.” Brooks does not directly say it but ending his article with “but they
are both probably useful for a person trying to live a well-considered life”
after comparing the two with America, his words lead the reader to determine
that Brooks is an advocate for the well-planned life, encouraging his readers
to live their lives this way.
No comments:
Post a Comment